High-quality instructional materials, assessment & learning strategies
Guidance for selecting, implementing, and assessing instructional materials that meet the needs of multilingual learners at every proficiency level.
Why it matters
As classrooms grow more diverse, MLLs need materials and assessments built for both content mastery and language development. This focus area equips leaders and educators with tailored, evidence-based strategies so language is never a barrier to demonstrating what students know.
Your role as a network leader
District and network leaders set the conditions that make good teaching possible — through policy, resource allocation, and the systems that support schools. Use this guidance to formulate policies, prioritize funding, and enable data-driven decision-making based on student performance and language acquisition.
HQIM should integrate assessment, differentiation, and culturally relevant content to support MLLs across all settings.
- Include formative assessments that evaluate language proficiency levels and identify both strengths and gaps — so instruction can be tailored from the start
- Provide systems for disaggregating linguistic assessment data so educators can analyze performance by proficiency level and adapt accordingly
- Equip educators with concrete differentiation strategies for students at various proficiency levels PD needed
- Establish dual-focus goals: content mastery and language development, with language objectives explicitly embedded in lesson plans
- Incorporate culturally relevant content that reflects the diverse backgrounds of MLLs — multiple perspectives, not just one
- Promote flexible grouping strategies that mix students with varying language abilities for peer support and language practice
- Ensure daily opportunities for peer discourse and interactive talk time are built into materials — not optional add-ons
- Provide family-facing resources in multiple languages as part of the materials package
- Require evidence-based practices and confirm materials are culturally and linguistically appropriate before adoption
- Define and communicate which assessments are required network-wide Required: ELPT, DIBELS, LEAP
- Collect and analyze assessment data to inform instructional practices — build a system for this, not just a spreadsheet
- Train educators on cultural contexts in assessment so that what gets measured reflects what students actually know
- Promote multimodal assessments — portfolios, performance tasks, and project-based work alongside traditional quizzes
- Define content-based assessments separately from language assessments: content assessments evaluate knowledge, not language; provide approved linguistic accommodations
- Implement language assessments targeting listening, speaking, reading, and writing in academic contexts EL Language Check-Up (K–12)
- Provide a clear framework for assessment accommodations (extended time, translation tools, read-aloud) without altering assessment integrity
- Develop systems for tracking student progress over time and establish feedback loops for educators to improve their practice
- Offer assessment design workshops as part of professional development — particularly on segmented, manageable assessment formats
- Support cognitive strategies network-wide: summarization, note-taking, graphic organizers — train teachers to teach these explicitly
- Promote metacognitive strategies: self-monitoring, goal-setting, and self-assessment to build independent learners
- Build vocabulary acquisition into all content areas — not just ELA — through graphic organizers and peer collaboration
- Ensure curricula reflect the diverse cultural backgrounds of MLLs to increase engagement and motivation
- Create collaborative learning structures network-wide so MLLs practice language in supportive peer environments
- Champion scaffolding as a core instructional approach: guide students from supported to independent learning
- Build a school culture that views mistakes as learning opportunities — encourage risk-taking in language use
- Leverage technology to enhance comprehension and language access
- Use embedded formative assessments to track progress and adjust instruction in real time
- Prioritize social-emotional development alongside academic learning — confidence and belonging matter
Your role as a school leader
Schools are where policy becomes practice. Your job is to create the conditions for teachers to succeed — through professional development, an inclusive culture, and strategic use of instructional materials. A culture of shared ownership means every teacher, regardless of subject, is responsible for MLL success.
- Regularly assess students' language proficiency and use that data to enable differentiated instruction school-wide
- Audit current materials for cultural relevance — do they reflect the diverse backgrounds of your MLL population?
- Set school-wide dual-focus goals: content mastery alongside language development, with explicit vocabulary instruction across subjects
- Provide teachers with scaffolding resources — graphic organizers, visual aids — and dedicate time to practice using them
- Create diverse grouping structures that mix proficiency levels — build this into scheduling and classroom culture
- Ensure HQIM implementation includes embedded language supports, formative assessment checkpoints, and vocabulary scaffolds
- Organize teacher PD workshops for materials internalization — help teachers craft lesson plans, not just receive curriculum
- Provide family-facing materials in multiple languages and actively involve families in school decisions
- Prioritize literacy development across all four domains: listening, speaking, reading, and writing
- Foster shared ownership — every teacher, regardless of subject, is responsible for MLL success
- Use multimodal assessments — portfolios, project-based learning, and presentations — alongside regular formative checks like exit tickets and oral quizzes
- Design content assessments that focus on knowledge, not language: apply approved accommodations (extra time, manipulatives, translation tools) so students can demonstrate what they know
- Implement language assessments targeting all four domains — use the EL Language Check-Up tools by grade band K, 1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–8, 9–12
- Provide accommodations per LEAP 2025 guidelines: extended time, native-language directions, word-to-word dictionaries, read-aloud in Math, Science, and Social Studies
- Segment assessments into smaller parts to reduce overwhelm — use project milestones and quiz series rather than comprehensive exams only
- Monitor content and language acquisition together — adjust instructional strategies based on what the data shows
- Invest in professional development on culturally relevant assessments and accommodation implementation
- Implement culturally responsive teaching school-wide — curricula and assessments should reflect who your students are
- Adopt cognitive, metacognitive, and social-affective learning strategies as shared school-wide practices, not individual classroom choices
- Foster collaboration between general education teachers, ESL teachers, and specialists — co-planning, shared resources, and joint problem-solving
- Ensure access to digital tools that support language learning: translation software, interactive platforms, online databases
- Build diverse assessment policies that value multiple ways of demonstrating knowledge
- Provide scaffolding resources and support systems for complex tasks — particularly for students moving from guided to independent work
- Foster a school culture that values diversity and encourages risk-taking in language use — mistakes are part of the learning process
- Involve families in the educational process — provide multilingual resources and create genuine opportunities for participation
- Create regular monitoring systems for both academic progress and language development — use the data to inform instruction
- Train educators continuously in effective strategies for MLLs — professional development is ongoing, not one-time
Your role as a classroom educator
Everything in this framework ultimately lives or dies in the classroom. Your knowledge of your students — their backgrounds, their strengths, their needs — is the most powerful tool in this work. Use the classroom-level guidance to personalize instruction, embed daily language support, and scaffold toward independence.
- Request ELPT results from your campus administration — knowing proficiency levels is the starting point for everything else
- Assess language proficiency regularly across all four domains to identify individual strengths and areas of need
- Use culturally relevant content that reflects your students' backgrounds — check whether your materials include multiple perspectives
- Set clear dual-focus goals for every lesson: what will students learn content-wise, and what language objective are you supporting?
- Explicitly teach academic vocabulary in context — don't assume students will pick it up on their own
- Create flexible groups that mix proficiency levels — peer support is one of the most powerful tools available to you
- Use scaffolding consistently: graphic organizers, visual aids, and guided practice before releasing students to independent work
- Prioritize foundational literacy: phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension — in every grade level where students need it
- Embed language supports visibly in your materials — highlight tools like visuals and flashcards, don't bury them
- Create daily opportunities for students to talk to each other in academic language — discourse is not a reward, it's a strategy
- Provide family resources in multiple languages and communicate proactively with families
- Use evidence-based differentiation strategies tailored to where each student is — not one-size-fits-all approaches
- Use required assessments (ELPT, DIBELS, Numeracy, LEAP) to understand each student's baseline — then build your instruction from there Required
- Use varied formative assessment techniques: quizzes, exit tickets, portfolios — gather ongoing data, not just end-of-unit snapshots
- Incorporate peer assessments — having students evaluate each other's work builds critical thinking and engagement
- Design content assessments that monitor understanding of subject matter — use accommodations so language doesn't get in the way of measuring knowledge
- Conduct language assessments that measure listening, speaking, reading, and writing in academic contexts
- Apply accommodations: extended time, translation tools, read-aloud options — these support fairness without lowering expectations
- Incorporate cultural contexts in formative assessments — use familiar examples and contexts to reduce anxiety and increase engagement
- Segment assessments into smaller, focused parts rather than long comprehensive exams
- Give immediate, meaningful feedback — students should know where they are and what their next step is
- Teach cognitive strategies directly — summarization, note-taking, graphic organizers are skills to be explicitly taught, not assumed
- Build metacognitive habits: help students self-monitor, set goals, and assess their own progress
- Acknowledge and incorporate students' diverse backgrounds into daily lessons — this is engagement, not decoration
- Provide comprehensible input slightly above students' current level, and create structured opportunities for student output
- Use graphic organizers to help students visualize relationships between ideas and support vocabulary acquisition
- Facilitate collaborative learning — peer interaction makes learning more meaningful and accelerates language development
- Use questioning techniques that require students to go beyond recall — deeper processing builds both language and understanding
- Break complex tasks into manageable steps — linguistic scaffolding helps students navigate challenges without giving up
- Use digital tools and collaborative platforms to enhance research skills and expand access to resources
- Implement reflection journals and SMART goal-setting — help students take ownership of their learning journey
- Build in peer assessment — students who evaluate each other's work develop critical engagement and self-reflection skills
- Create group activities that allow students to share their cultural backgrounds — belonging matters for learning
- Abedi, J. (2006). Language issues in item development.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment.
- Echevarría, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2017). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Pearson.
- Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Heinemann.
- González, N. (2018). Culturally responsive assessment practices.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1).
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Cooperative learning in the 21st century.
- Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
- Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. AERJ, 32(3).
- Mapp, K. L. (2012). Title I and family engagement: A toolkit for educators.
- O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.
- Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback.
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom.
- WIDA (2020). WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2).
The full guidance document includes the complete reference list (60+ sources). Download it from the Resources tab.
Community & cultural engagement
Families and communities are not peripheral to MLL success — they are co-creators of it. This section outlines how to build genuine, two-way partnerships at every level.
Why it matters
Family and community engagement is a co-creative force, not an add-on. Effective bidirectional communication lets families receive information and share their insights and concerns — building ownership and partnership that makes multilingual programs more inclusive and effective.
Understanding the New Orleans community
New Orleans is a culturally diverse city shaped by many heritages. While English is the primary language, many residents also speak Spanish, French, Vietnamese, and Haitian Creole. A notable portion of public-school students are classified as multilingual learners, and socioeconomic challenges — including high poverty levels — affect access to educational resources.
Community organizations play a vital role through language classes and cultural programs. Understanding these factors is essential for building educational frameworks that serve MLLs well.
Enhance educational experiences for MLLs through community partnerships and resource development that foster ownership and connection.
- Community partnerships: actively seek partnerships with local organizations to enhance resources and support for families, ensuring MLL programs are culturally relevant and community-centered
- Resource allocation: dedicate resources to family-engagement initiatives, ensuring materials are provided in multiple languages and accessible formats, as outlined under Title III of the ESEA
- Professional development: allocate funds and plan PD for educators and administrators on effective communication techniques and culturally responsive practices to engage families meaningfully
- Evaluation & improvement: establish a framework for tracking engagement outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of cultural initiatives on students' academic success and community involvement
Create a supportive environment that promotes responsibility and belonging by deepening understanding of the community.
- Understanding the community: conduct surveys and host cultural events; form partnerships with local organizations and participate in community service projects to foster connection and responsibility
- Cultural-awareness training: offer workshops on cultural competence and multilingualism that address educator bias and assess staff readiness — not just surface-level awareness
- Multilingual events & activities: organize activities that enrich the school environment and strengthen connections among students and families
- Resource development for families: create bilingual materials and host awareness workshops on charter school systems, graduation requirements, and higher-education pathways
- Student support networks: facilitate peer support, mentorship, and academic assistance so MLLs connect with peers and receive guidance
Build inclusive classrooms where every student feels valued, and connect learners with their families and cultures.
- Building inclusive classrooms: use the Tier 1 curriculum provided by your administration, ensuring it is culturally responsive and accommodates diverse cultural backgrounds
- Effective communication: foster open communication with multilingual families, including awareness of non-verbal communication and its cultural variations
- Social & emotional support: create safe spaces for open dialogue about cultural differences, identity, and challenges — emotional safety is a prerequisite for academic risk-taking
- Celebrating cultural diversity: organize events that highlight cultural traditions and invite students and families to share their heritage in meaningful (not tokenizing) ways
- Peer teaching programs: allow fluent newcomer students to help teach peers about their culture and language, reinforcing their skills and fostering pride
- Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural diversity and education. Routledge.
- Cummins, J. (2017). Bilingual education and the development of biliteracy.
- Gonzalez, A. (2015). Family engagement in multilingual education: Building advocacy and leadership skills.
- Hernandez, D. J. (2019). Connecting families and schools. Harvard Education Press.
- Housel, D. A. (2020). Supporting the engagement of multilingual immigrant families. School Community Journal, 30(2).
- Miller, R. (2020). Building community through multilingual events. J. of Multilingual Education Research, 11(1).
- Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students.
- Zentella, A. C. (2018). The language of our families.
School-systems core commitments
Eleven commitments that networks and schools make to cultivate inclusive environments — through timely identification, targeted support, and ongoing monitoring of multilingual learners.
How to read this section — the implementation continuum
Each commitment breaks down into three levels of practice. Compliance meets essential requirements — the baseline of care. Investment allocates resources and evidence-based practices to elevate support. Exemplary / Mastery is comprehensive and intentional, with advanced strategies and continuous evaluation. Each level builds on the one before it.
Your role as a network leader
These commitments are primarily district- and network-level obligations — many are civil-rights requirements. Use the continuum to audit current practice across your schools, identify growth opportunities, and systematically advance from compliance toward mastery.
Your role as a school leader
At the school site, these commitments become daily systems: identification and assessment, scheduling, staffing, family communication, and progress monitoring. Use the continuum to see where your site sits today and what the next level of practice looks like.
Your role as a classroom educator
These are system-level commitments, but teachers make them real — through integrated instruction, progress monitoring, scaffolding, and inclusive classrooms. Review the commitments below to understand the structures you contribute to and can advocate for.
A holistic structure underpinning the framework — promoting personal development and meaningful integration for MLLs.
- Mindset: a growth mindset for MLLs and educators alike — resilience and the belief that skills develop through dedication and effort, viewing challenges as opportunities for growth
- Heartset: the emotional and ethical dimension — nurturing emotional intelligence and empathy to build supportive environments and strong relationships
- Skillset: cognitive and practical skills — language proficiency and critical thinking — enhanced by culturally relevant teaching that makes learning meaningful and applicable
Networks and sites must quickly identify MLLs who need language assistance. Parents must be notified within 30 days of enrollment about placement, and a Home Language Survey guides timely English-proficiency assessment (ELPS/ELPT).
- Follow every step of the LDOE MLL Identification Flowchart: LEA enrollment, Home Language Survey, ELP Screener within 30 days, family survey, and proficiency testing
- Classify students who do not test proficient and inform parents about appropriate services
- Maintain compliance-monitoring procedures to prevent under- or over-identification
- Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment (family interview) and develop an individualized language-acquisition plan
- Train staff to administer the ELPS/ELPT and interpret results accurately
- Complete and update the Statewide MLL Accommodation Checklist by deadline; use formative assessments to monitor progress
- Regularly revisit individual student and family needs; assess barriers such as housing, nutrition, prior schooling gaps, attendance, and digital access
- Administer home-language assessments to determine academic level and identify transferable skills
- Run intentional newcomer-parent engagement: parent nights, conferences, translated communication, and on-demand interpreters
Programs must be built on rigorous standards tailored to students' language proficiency and academic backgrounds so MLLs engage meaningfully with the curriculum.
- Provide evidence-based language-assistance services delivered by trained personnel
- Ensure inclusive access for all learners regardless of L1, educational background, or exceptionalities
- Continue proficiency-based support until students meet Louisiana reclassification criteria; align service quantity with proficiency levels
- Sustain support for long-term learners who have not yet met exit criteria
- Train 50%+ of content faculty to support language development; hire and develop staff for MLL needs
- Provide content-based instruction where 50%+ of content instructors teach language and content simultaneously
- Keep all stakeholders informed on progress and exit requirements; conduct needs assessments for students more than a year off trajectory
- 85%+ of faculty integrate content-based strategies daily; leadership gives regular feedback on sheltered instruction
- Provide individualized, differentiated daily service hours and push-in support in high-language-density classes
- Leverage internal and external partnerships for high-dosage tutoring and after-school programs
Effective programs require qualified personnel trained in language acquisition and culturally responsive teaching, backed by ongoing professional development.
- Honor MLL students' legal entitlement to adequately resourced programs staffed by qualified teachers
- Employ certified MLL teachers and administrators; provide additional training as needed
- Maintain a clear staff-development plan to increase ESL-endorsed staff
- Provide ongoing PD in culturally responsive teaching; cultivate lead teachers as MLL-strategy experts (push-in/pull-out)
- Train paraeducators in content-specific instruction; implement inclusive, diverse hiring
- Offer mentorship and ongoing support for new teachers of MLLs
- Develop retention strategies (competitive salaries, advancement, supportive environments) and bilingual stipends
- 85%+ of staff engage in quarterly differentiated PD; all content teachers hold valid ESL endorsements
- Partner with universities and certification programs to build a local pipeline of qualified educators
MLLs must have equal opportunity to participate in all educational activities — advanced placement, dual enrollment, CTE, and extracurriculars — supporting both academic growth and belonging.
- Provide comprehensive language assistance alongside curricular support to address deficits incurred while learning English
- Design programs for English proficiency and participation parity, with full access to the core curriculum from the outset
- Place MLLs in age-appropriate grades with full access to facilities; deliver grade-level content without diluting the curriculum
- Monitor progress in core subjects and remedy any deficits with compensatory services
- Provide individualized academic/graduation plans for emerging-bilingual or newcomer pathways
- Ensure equal participation in AP, co-curricular, and extracurricular activities including athletics
- Create clear on-time graduation pathways, with special attention to SIFE and under-credited older students
- Continuously evaluate and adjust programs on performance data; give staff proficiency scores and scaffolding guidance
- Maintain a comprehensive monitoring system for language acquisition and content mastery
- Provide differentiated graduation-pathway coaching and multilingual family support; ensure parity and cultural representation in extracurriculars
Networks and schools must actively prevent unjustified segregation based on national origin or language status — whether indiscriminate, disenfranchising, social, or long-term.
- Ensure MLLs and immigrant students are not isolated or excluded due to background or language status
- Build integrated schedules so ESL instruction does not meaningfully interfere with general education, social interaction, or advancement
- Provide yearly PD on research-based strategies for supporting MLLs across proficiency levels and grouping them effectively
- Develop a newcomer program focused on reintegration based on language development and progress
- Conduct regular program evaluations to ensure MLLs and recently arrived learners achieve parity across all academic tracks
Evaluate MLLs for potential disabilities without bias from limited English proficiency. Provide both language assistance and special-education services, avoiding over- and under-identification.
- Provide MLL students with disabilities both language-assistance and disability-related services under federal law
- Locate, identify, and evaluate MLLs who may have a disability in a timely manner under IDEA and Section 504
- Conduct evaluations in an appropriate language; include planning-team members knowledgeable about the student's language needs
- Administer assessments in the child's native language or mode of communication for accurate results
- Include IEP-team members with expertise in second-language acquisition to distinguish LEP from disability
- Gather comprehensive background information, including prior language-based interventions
- Achieve parity in special-education representation (G&T, IDEA, 504) reflecting the overall student population
Schools must clearly communicate the implications of opting out. Even when families decline services, schools remain responsible for meeting students' educational needs.
- Recognize all MLLs are entitled to services; guardians may opt out via the annual Parent Notification Letter
- Never recommend that guardians opt out for any reason
- Provide informed guidance in a language families understand; document voluntary, informed decisions
- Continue monitoring progress; families may opt back in at any time
- Invest in universal English Language Development (ELD) instruction to meet compliance obligations
- Hold in-person parent meetings with a memorandum of understanding outlining what opting out entails
- Take affirmative steps when monitoring shows an opt-out student is struggling
- Deliver targeted academic interventions via content teachers, interventionists, and non-ESL support staff
- Coordinate supports so opt-out students stay "on track" along the ELPT trajectory toward proficiency
Ongoing monitoring of both language acquisition and academic performance is essential. Networks must annually administer a valid ELP assessment across reading, writing, listening, and speaking.
- Monitor all MLLs to ensure timely English proficiency and content knowledge
- Annually administer a valid, reliable ELP assessment in all four domains, aligned to State ELP standards
- Administer the ELPT each spring; a student may exit by scoring 4+ in each domain; monitor exited students for two years
- Monitor the four domains quarterly using a formal assessment (e.g., TELL)
- Provide families quarterly updates on proficiency growth and next steps
- Adjust instructional groupings and curricula in response to proficiency development
- Monitor the four domains monthly; use daily language production as formative assessment through Tier I
- Hold regular family meetings; MLL and content teachers collaborate to tailor instruction to each student's level
Follow LDOE standardized exit procedures grounded in demonstrated proficiency and readiness for general education.
- Do not exit a student until they demonstrate English proficiency in speaking, listening, reading, and writing on an ELP assessment
- Monitor former MLLs' academic progress for at least two years to ensure they were not prematurely exited
- Track exited students via a documented plan: classroom grades, assessment scores, attendance, and related evidence
Evaluating MLL programs is essential to confirm they help students overcome language barriers, reach proficiency, and participate in rigorous courses comparable to their peers.
- Provide evidence of research-based MLL programming — MLL-certified teachers and observable, tiered instructional support
- All identified MLLs take the ELPT annually to assess progress and proficiency
- Regularly evaluate programs with accurate data on current and former MLLs; make timely adjustments
- Run quarterly performance assessments (reading, writing, math) and data-review meetings
- Offer qualified programs: Structured/Sheltered English, Transitional Bilingual, Newcomer, Dual Language, Content-based ELD
- Evaluate success across statewide, national, and district assessments over multiple years
- Provide enhanced programming — cultural-exchange activities and support beyond conventional hours, staffed by qualified individuals at little to no cost
- Foster continuous improvement with feedback loops and targeted intervention programs (e.g., reading comprehension)
Provide essential information in languages families understand. First-language communication builds a welcoming environment and a strong home-school connection.
- Grant meaningful access to instruction, services, and information in a language families understand
- Provide translated materials and interpretation services so families can engage fully
- Represent students' languages in posted information; provide home-language texts and instructional materials when appropriate
- Make bulletin boards, newsletters, and websites available in multiple languages
- Evaluate language-access systems for effectiveness using family and staff feedback
- Recognize primary languages as strengths; use translanguaging to develop English and first-language proficiency
- Treat language access as a whole-school responsibility and work to eliminate systemic barriers
- Publicly share evaluation results with stakeholders through annual reports
Bridging MLL services K–12
Strategies for ensuring continuity of support for multilingual learners as they progress through the K–12 system.