New Orleans Multilingual Learner Framework

New Orleans Public Schools

Supporting every multilingual learner — at every level

A practical framework for charter school networks, school leaders, and teachers to align their work around the success of multilingual learners across New Orleans. Choose your role to see the guidance that applies to you.

I am a…
Viewing as: Network or system leader

High-quality instructional materials, assessment & learning strategies

Guidance for selecting, implementing, and assessing instructional materials that meet the needs of multilingual learners at every proficiency level.

Why it matters

As classrooms grow more diverse, MLLs need materials and assessments built for both content mastery and language development. This focus area equips leaders and educators with tailored, evidence-based strategies so language is never a barrier to demonstrating what students know.

Your role as a network leader

District and network leaders set the conditions that make good teaching possible — through policy, resource allocation, and the systems that support schools. Use this guidance to formulate policies, prioritize funding, and enable data-driven decision-making based on student performance and language acquisition.

HQIM should integrate assessment, differentiation, and culturally relevant content to support MLLs across all settings.

  • Include formative assessments that evaluate language proficiency levels and identify both strengths and gaps — so instruction can be tailored from the start
  • Provide systems for disaggregating linguistic assessment data so educators can analyze performance by proficiency level and adapt accordingly
  • Equip educators with concrete differentiation strategies for students at various proficiency levels PD needed
  • Establish dual-focus goals: content mastery and language development, with language objectives explicitly embedded in lesson plans
  • Incorporate culturally relevant content that reflects the diverse backgrounds of MLLs — multiple perspectives, not just one
  • Promote flexible grouping strategies that mix students with varying language abilities for peer support and language practice
  • Ensure daily opportunities for peer discourse and interactive talk time are built into materials — not optional add-ons
  • Provide family-facing resources in multiple languages as part of the materials package
  • Require evidence-based practices and confirm materials are culturally and linguistically appropriate before adoption
  • Define and communicate which assessments are required network-wide Required: ELPT, DIBELS, LEAP
  • Collect and analyze assessment data to inform instructional practices — build a system for this, not just a spreadsheet
  • Train educators on cultural contexts in assessment so that what gets measured reflects what students actually know
  • Promote multimodal assessments — portfolios, performance tasks, and project-based work alongside traditional quizzes
  • Define content-based assessments separately from language assessments: content assessments evaluate knowledge, not language; provide approved linguistic accommodations
  • Implement language assessments targeting listening, speaking, reading, and writing in academic contexts EL Language Check-Up (K–12)
  • Provide a clear framework for assessment accommodations (extended time, translation tools, read-aloud) without altering assessment integrity
  • Develop systems for tracking student progress over time and establish feedback loops for educators to improve their practice
  • Offer assessment design workshops as part of professional development — particularly on segmented, manageable assessment formats
  • Support cognitive strategies network-wide: summarization, note-taking, graphic organizers — train teachers to teach these explicitly
  • Promote metacognitive strategies: self-monitoring, goal-setting, and self-assessment to build independent learners
  • Build vocabulary acquisition into all content areas — not just ELA — through graphic organizers and peer collaboration
  • Ensure curricula reflect the diverse cultural backgrounds of MLLs to increase engagement and motivation
  • Create collaborative learning structures network-wide so MLLs practice language in supportive peer environments
  • Champion scaffolding as a core instructional approach: guide students from supported to independent learning
  • Build a school culture that views mistakes as learning opportunities — encourage risk-taking in language use
  • Leverage technology to enhance comprehension and language access
  • Use embedded formative assessments to track progress and adjust instruction in real time
  • Prioritize social-emotional development alongside academic learning — confidence and belonging matter
Full HQIM guidance document
Complete strategies, references, and implementation tools
  • Abedi, J. (2006). Language issues in item development.
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment.
  • Echevarría, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2017). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Pearson.
  • Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Heinemann.
  • González, N. (2018). Culturally responsive assessment practices.
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1).
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Cooperative learning in the 21st century.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. AERJ, 32(3).
  • Mapp, K. L. (2012). Title I and family engagement: A toolkit for educators.
  • O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.
  • Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom.
  • WIDA (2020). WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2).

The full guidance document includes the complete reference list (60+ sources). Download it from the Resources tab.